Bloomberg, Capital IQ (CapIQ), Factset and Refinitiv are the leading providers of financial data, which play a critical role in a finance professional’s workflow.
For example, an investment banking analyst requires accurate historical data and supplementary data to build a 3-statement model forecast. Likewise, for a currency trader looking for real-time quotes, access to up-to-date and accurate financial data is imperative.
As present, the financial data industry is dominated by four large providers:
All four financial data providers attempt to offer a one-stop-shop platform that provides all types of financial data services – however, access to such quality can come with a massive price tag attached.
The goal of our article is to provide a thorough comparison of cost, industry relevance (i.e. buy-side vs. sell-side), and features of each platform that might push users to favor one data provider over another.
| Platform | Pricing | Market Share (1) |
| Bloomberg | The cost of a Bloomberg Terminal is $27,660/year for one license, and terminals are leased on a two-year basis. The price drops to $24,240 per terminal per year for two or more terminals. See below for academic pricing. | 33.4% |
| Capital IQ | The cost of Capital IQ is not published publicly, as the pricing model is tier-based and tailored to meet the specific needs of each customer. The lack of transparency around Capital IQ's pricing stems from their product offerings being customized solutions for the customer profile and specific use-cases. | 6.2% |
| FactSet | The cost of a FactSet subscription is $12,000 per year for the full product. | 4.5% |
| Refinitiv Eikon | The cost of Eikon is $22,000 per year, but a stripped-down version can cost as little as $3,600 per year. | 19.6% |
(1) Source: Burton-Taylor International Consulting 2020 Financial Market Data Report
Bloomberg is the 800-pound gorilla in the financial data world, with financial data revenue of approximately $10+ billion. It controls more than ~33% of the financial data market. Its closest rival is Refinitiv Eikon, with ~20% of the market share.
The cost of a Bloomberg Terminal is $27,660 per year, and terminals are leased on a two-year basis. The price drops to $24,240 per terminal per year for 2 or more terminals.
Academic discounts: For universities looking to power their finance labs with the famous terminals, Bloomberg offers significant incentives. For example, once schools commit to 3 terminals, they can get nine additional machines for free, dropping the total per-terminal cost to as little as $3,000 per year.
Buy-side, sales and trading, and asset management. While the Bloomberg terminal is used across the financial services world, it is used predominantly by portfolio managers, buy-side analysts, and sell-side finance professionals within the sales and trading, and asset management functions.
You’re in any way involved in the bond market. Bloomberg’s fixed income data is second to none. Its data sets are more comprehensive and are updated more quickly than any of its peers, making it especially useful for credit research analysts, fixed income sales and bond traders, and professionals in debt capital markets.
Then there's Bloomberg’s instant messaging service — one of Bloomberg’s arguably stickiest features. Bloomberg’s IM service allows anyone on the terminal to IM with others on the terminal. Why is this exciting? Because if traders at all the trading desks are posting quotes on Bloomberg IM and nowhere else, you simply have to be on Bloomberg. It’s basically the same reason you’re on Facebook and not on MySpace.
This is a sticky feature for Bloomberg as it faces competition from the Eikon platform and chat-only startup alternative Symphony. In an effort to kill Symphony, in October of 2017 Bloomberg surprised many observers by decoupling IM from the rest of the terminal license. It now charges $10 per month for IM only (your company has to own at least one terminal to be able to get this service for additional users).
You’re in investment banking. Investment bankers do not use Bloomberg as widely as some of their sell-side peers and buy-side professionals. For example, the M&A team at an investment bank might have a couple of Bloomberg Terminals available, but it's unlikely that each banker will have their own machine.
Instead, investment bankers are far more likely to have their own dedicated FactSet or Capital IQ subscription. That’s because Capital IQ and FactSet have developed specific capabilities such as a click-through function to audit data in source documents, Excel plugins that increase productivity, and company and transaction screening tools designed specifically with the investment banking workflow in mind (more on this below).
Capital IQ (CapIQ) was founded in 1998 and was acquired by McGraw Hill’s S&P division for $200 million in 2004.
Unlike Bloomberg or FactSet, Capital IQ (CapIQ) is a web-based portal accessible from any machine.
The Capital IQ offering was strengthened further in July 2015 with McGraw Hill’s $2.2 billion purchase of rival SNL. While Capital IQ and its largest rival FactSet provide financial data across all sectors, SNL’s strength has been unparalleled financial and transaction data sets within specific sectors, namely insurance, banking, real estate, energy, metals and mining, and media.
Capital IQ’s pricing is non-public information, as mentioned earlier, because the price is specific to the customer and their specific needs.
The flexibility of Capital IQ’s pricing model coincides with the wide range of features offered to customers, unlike many of its competitors that provide strict pricing.
For example, factors that can potentially impact the price include the firm type, size of the firm (AUM), number of licenses, regional location, research report access, configuration needs, and more.
In general, CapIQ is known for being a more affordable option than Bloomberg, however, the pricing can vary substantially based on the features requested.
Therefore, for the most accurate, up-to-date pricing data, we recommend reaching out directly to Capital IQ's client support team.
Investment banking. Bankers do a lot of data scrubbing, spreading comps and company profiles, and Capital IQ is designed specifically to help with this.
You’re on the go and need to access financial data from a variety of computers. While Bloomberg access requires a dedicated terminal and FactSet access requires a software installation on each machine, your Capital IQ account can be accessed from a web browser anywhere.
If real-time market data isn’t critical for your job, that is where Bloomberg, along with FactSet and Refinitiv Eikon, might be more a suitable option than Capital IQ. The kinds of roles where this really matters are on the buy side, in sales and trading, and in public equities and fixed income.
As of 2017, FactSet had 89,000 clients with total revenue of approximately $1.3 billion, making it the fourth largest player in the financial data space after Bloomberg, Refinitiv Eikon, and S&P (Capital IQ + SNL). Per FactSet’s 2017 10K, buy side clients accounted for 84.1% of revenue, while the remainder came from the sell side (i.e. M&A, capital markets and equity research).
The cost of a FactSet subscription is $12,000 per year for the full product.
Investment bankers. FactSet is comparable to Capital IQ in terms of scope of data and functionality. Much of Capital IQ’s early strength has been bridged by FactSet, which now boasts its own set of comprehensively scrubbed financial data, estimates and click-through functionality.
You absolutely have to go with FactSet if your life revolves around making pitchbooks. While Capital IQ’s Excel CIQ codes are somewhat easier to work with, FactSet’s 2007 purchase of DealMaven gives FactSet users the ability to increase financial modeling efficiency via helpful formatting and custom macro shortcuts that Capital IQ hasn’t quite caught up to yet. In addition, FactSet’s PowerPoint plugin enables bankers to automate much of the pitchbook presentation process. Another frequently cited FactSet advantage over Capital IQ is the ease of navigation and getting around the user interface.
You need equity research. FactSet does not offer robust equity research access. You could, of course, access this through another service, but if you want it all in one place, FactSet isn’t the right choice. Perhaps even more of a deterrent for some is that FactSet requires a physical installation on each machine, and it is only allowed on two machines per subscription.
| Feature | Advantage |
|---|---|
| Fundamental data, Estimates, Conference call transcripts | S&P (Capital IQ +SNL) |
| Real-time market data | FactSet |
| Equity Research | S&P (Capital IQ +SNL) |
| User interface | FactSet |
| Unique data sets | FactSet |
| Transaction screening | S&P (Capital IQ +SNL) |
| Excel plugin | FactSet |
| Access data on a browser from any computer | S&P (Capital IQ +SNL) |
| Cost | FactSet |
While Capital IQ differentiates itself on cost, its focus on fundamental data, and usefulness on the sell side, Eikon is the most direct competitor to the Bloomberg Terminal. The cost of Refinitiv Eikon is $22,000 per year, but a very stripped-down version can cost as little as $3,600 per year.
Those who would otherwise buy Bloomberg but want something cheaper. It has a lot of the same financial data as Bloomberg but is generally considered to be the lesser option in terms of data breadth. To put it bluntly, it’s what you get junior staff if you want to save on costs while the senior folks are using Bloomberg.
Comparing platforms like Bloomberg, FactSet, Capital IQ, and Refinitiv can be time-consuming and subjective. Artificial intelligence streamlines this evaluation by benchmarking data coverage, analyzing interface usability, and tailoring recommendations to user workflows. Wall Street Prep and Columbia Business School Executive Education created the AI for Business & Finance Certificate Program to help professionals leverage AI-assisted comparisons and select the best tools for financial analysis.
Learn how institutional investors identify high-potential undervalued stocks. Enrollment is open for the upcoming cohort.
good topic. i work on bloomberg
Good comparison in terms of pricing info & product offerings. I worked with S&P Capital IQ.
Good topic about the Market data providers, am feeling proud to worked with S&P Global(Capital IQ)…
i would contact with you
Interesting overview, just a quick note on FactSet, FactSet does nowadays offer access to its applications through a (not locally installed) weblink and a mobile app. Makes for easier access for some users indeed.
Thanks for letting us know Lindi!
Please compare them from the perspective of sell-side equity research professionals.
Syed,
Thanks for your suggestions! I would say broadly, each system has its relative strong/weak points. Is there any specific question you have in mind? Thanks!
I am a researcher who is currently working on a project related to sell-side equity research. I really think it would be good for me to write a comparative note on these information services. Also, I am based in Pakistan, so some of those might not be relevant.
Syed,
Yes – beyond this post, our experiences are more individualized. I would say Bloomberg is superior for market-related data. In terms of analytics/financial information, you can get a ton of information from every provider, but then there are specific metrics that are calculated that are sometimes difficult to interpret. In my experience with Capital IQ, it’s always been very easy to drill deep into a metric and see how their staff calculated it. My experience with Thomson and Factset is limited, but they have similar capabilities to CapitalIQ. I would suggest going through a demo for each tool yourself – hope this helps!
Also, Metisglobal has not been compared. And I wonder why it is quite popular in Pakistan – definitely after bloomberg.
Syed,
Appreciate you sharing your knowledge – thanks!
Best,
Haseeb Chowdhry
How does Marketmap by FIS Global compare against the other data terminals?
Ash:
We are not sure as no one at WSP has worked with that platform.
Best,
Jeff
Marketmap (from SunGuard acquisition) is dated, clunky and frustrating to use). They don’t have nearly as many options, but idntou just care about pricing data it’s okay.
Hi, Jason, thanks for these additional inputs!
BB
Hey, I new to the Industry, and without hands on any of these it would be difficult to break into the Industry. How can a newbie learn any 1 of them to get a break or can get even an internship somehow.
Sanjay:
Are you currently in university? Many schools have Bloomberg terminals you can use. Outside of that, you really won’t be able to practice using these data sources until you are on the job. I wouldn’t let that get you down as I doubt anyone will hire you based on your knowledge (or lack thereof) of Bloomberg of FactSet.
Best,
Jeff
Sanjay, Bloomberg offers a certification course which is inexpensive and even free or close for bona fide students. It’s called Bloomberg Market Concepts and it’s designed to pre-qualify newcomers (or old comers!) on BBG terminal functionality and features. Just google ‘Bloomberg Market Concepts’ and you’ll likely see a link for a Bloomberg for Education website with the info about and registration form for the course, which you complete on your own computer but the experience is ‘as if’ using the terminal. BBG issued a BMC certificate upon completion which you can attach to your LinkedIn profile, mention in your CV etc. It can help land you that intern or junior role if for no other reason than it demonstrates your enthusiasm to want to be chained to one of terminals for the remainder of your adult working life (just kidding ). But seriously it shows your enthusiasm and commitment and puts you ahead of the bloke who may not have it because that individual will be totally lost when first sitting down at a terminal. The material covered in the course is good to know regardless. All in, a no-brainer for internship or job seekers. Learn Python too and you’ll be golden. Cheers and good luck
Kevin is this available to people that are thinking about becoming a student or individual investors prior to purchasing?
Great article. I think Dealogic must be mentioned as it’s the largest M&A, ECM, DCM database in the market, plus their parent company (ION) just acquired Acuris (owner of Mergermarket, Debtwire, etc).
Any idea of the Alternative Investments Data Market size? Trying to estimate a size for the market, players include: S&P, LCD, Pitchbook, Preqin, Factset, TR, Acuris, Dealogic, Datafox, CBInsights, Burgiss, CEPRES, Cambridge Associates. Please let me know if you have any source for that?
John:
Unfortunately, we do not have any data for that determination.
Best,
Jeff
Hi. How up to date is your pricing? The reason I’m asking is because I can’t seem to find the USD 3,600 a year Thomson Reuters Eikon offering. Lowest I hear is around 6000 a year
Albert:
I don’t currently have pricing but I’m open to someone else chiming in.
Best,
Jeff
The pricing of Eikon is highly dependent on what type of data you are looking for. You will not get something that is professionally usable for $3600, but you can get your hands on a subscription for prices in that range. However, if you want to have data coverage over “enough” (up to you what that means) asset classes and regions you are looking at a subscription much closer to minimum $1500/month. It is meant to be a more modular competitor to Bloomberg and is priced accordingly.
Eikon (Refinitiv) has significantly improved its offering over the past two years. That said, they’re still lagging far behind when it comes to high level support involving advanced functionalities and platform capabilities. Many times, I found myself providing tech support to Eikon support reps when I inquired about features such as Portfolio Dashboard. The Eikon terminal is very good at aggregating news, but for $11000 per month (Eikon + QA Cloud + REDI (with Portfolio Trader) + a few custom data sets like MarketPsyche Indices), you can find much better solutions for your research and analytics spend. Some firms like to allocate Eikon terminals to their junior staff, but doing so exposes the firm to an enormous amount of down time as jr. employees need a lot of training and Eikon’s pre-recorded training tutorials are dated, archaic and just plain dull with no option to speed up the playback. Lastly, Refinitiv will torch a client relationship and go adversarial if it benefits them in any way. Sales rep’s and account managers will make promises they never intend to keep. Although I’ve never had these issues as I’ve had an Eikon terminal for a long time, I’ve had colleagues that have been burned. Far too many to count. The most useful feature for buy side equity traders is the Portfolio Dashboard, but as of Sep 2019, it’s still clumsy, slow, poorly designed and continually changing making it difficult to keep up.
Can you elaborate on what you get for $1500/month or the bare bones? Does getting bond pricing make Eikon pretty much as costly as Bloomberg?
See Metastock’s Xenith offering. That’s the one
If you want Eikon and want to save thousands of dollars per month, it’s easy. Go to http://www.equis.com and get a subscription to Xenith, which is Eikon under a different name. Equis was spun out from Thomson Reuters many years ago. The carve out included Metastock and Equis focuses primarily on marketing different versions of Metastock to the retail crowd and actually includes Xenith for no additional cost if you purchase a Metastock Pro Real Time subscription for $250/month with a THREE month free trail of both. In other words, you can get Eikon (Xenith) with Metastock Pro for $3000/yr plus data feeds. The ONLY core functionality missing from Xenith is Portfolio Dashboard, but trust me, Dashboard isn’t worth $20,000/yr. Frankly, it’s not even worth $500/yr. You can get better portfolio analytics using open source solutions like Quantopian, or Quantopian Enterprise through FactSet. Portfolio Dashboard is trying very hard to replicate Bisam B-One, which FactSet markets for roughly $10,000/mo.
Exactly. Xenith is the ticket for everyone not using soft dollars to pay for the big subs.
Yeah they are offering now around USD 500 per month
So Refinitiv also owns Metastock and through them they offer Xenith, which is the ‘stripped down’ but still very capable depending on your needs version of Eikon. I think it’s now only around $2k/yr excluding real time data fees of course. If you’re not a fund paying for Eikon or BBG with soft dollars (which is how the overwhelming bulk of those pricey subs are paid) Xenith is for you. Unfortunately BBG offers no such low cost or a’la carte version. Cheers
Excellent Article. Alpha Vee’s terminal is also a notable one to mention for Equity buy side work
As a non-US individual investor, I used Bloomberg for like six years and finally quit as I was fed up with their arrogance. Any complaints and they respond with (Goldman Sacks) having 2000 terminals and they’re like “who are you to talk with one subscription?” This happening not because I am asking them to take me to the moon but because my client rep was making big mistakes. They loathe individual investors, at least that was the case with me. However, the support accessible through the help button on the terminal is excellent and they do anything to help you including on Saturdays. I believe the terminals also have trading capabilities though I never used them. BB is great at bonds as the article states and I loved BB for equity research as it could list and analyze a giant list of companies.
Thompson is, equity-wise, a much weaker platform when compared to Bloomberg. To my knowledge, fx dealers at banks use it.. I do not know the other platforms but now use regular websites such as Yahoo Finance and Interactive Brokers and they mostly satisfy my needs. If I need any further info, I contact my banker.
You can get a lot of banker assistance for the $2k a month you’re saving. The only thing I miss is the messaging. I used to work at a Chicago prop desk and was able to keep up with my former colleagues and still ‘be a name’, which evaporated along with my bberg sub.
Thank you for your response I’m an individual who wants to start looking at tools to use and I was like Bloomberg would be fairly expensive for a newbie like me so I will look at Yahoo Finance and Interactive Brokers.
Yes, thank you MK00 for this contribution. Those are great open-source places to begin.
BB
See my response to MK00 above. Check out Barchart.com. I’m not affiliated. Just a happy user
MK00, check out Barchart.com. Fantastic website and inexpensive annual subscription. They’re the reincarnation of the old Commodity Research Bureau (CRB) which began in 1934. Amazing features. And they recently developed an Excel add-in that’s very powerful and can be enabled for real-time market data. They cover equities and futures in North America, Europe and Australasia. Interactive Brokers TWS as you mentioned is also great. So many features. Great for options traders especially IMO. Cheers
As of 2020 you would use :
BBG – Fixed Income and OTC; Trading
CiQ – as reported historical financials (PE/VC , partly used in M&A)
TR – Treasury, News, Datafeeds (core data), Prices Corporate Actions
FDS – Research, Analysis, Attribution, Multi Asset PM and Risk, Screening, Backtesting, Excel, Alternative Data e.g. Supply Chain, Geographical Revenue, AI, Market Intelligence
Thanks for the color and your thoughts.
Best,
Jeff
Bloomberg is the go to for fixed income, without a shadow of doubt. But for Portfolio Managers and buy side analysts, FactSet is the tool. Firstly, $12,000 is the very basic price, which doesn’t actually give you a lot, it’s their entry level price. To get the full range of portfolio analytics, SPAR and Axioma is pushing on $55,000 a year. It’s considerably more powerful than the others. Every aspect can be customised and its interface is much better too. Reuters is a waste of money in my opinion. The big hedge funds use FactSet for their analysis and it’s unsurprising given the scope and depth one achieve with it. I’m very lucky to have access to it, its been a real game changer for me and also a very steep learning curve. It does take a few months to learn how to navigate your way around it, it’s not particularly intuitive. But once the platform is set up the way you want it, it reduces the work load significantly.
Harry:
Thanks for the color.
Best,
Jeff
Excellent comparison – a lot of work went into this study.
I am interested in the time (i.e number of days) it takes to post fundamental company data (i.e. balance sheet, income statement, sources of capital, etc.) following the release of the data by the company. Does anyone have comparative data or opinions regarding the timeliness of the fundamental data being posted by Bloomberg, FactSet, Eikon and CapitalIQ? Who does the best job from a timeliness standpoint.
Good Q
Hi, I’m interested in purchasing an annual subscription that provides equity research access (GS, JPM, etc.). I’ve read through the above, but can’t determine which one would be best for my needs there. Can anyone chime in? Thanks!
Banks typically prefer ThomsonOne / Eikon for this. Although GS and few other bulge brackets would count as “premium reports” and would fall outside the subscription, you’ll get most branded in Eikon (JPM, Jefferies, UBS, Cowen etc.).
@ibanker, depends if user is a client of those banks and is able to access real-time research. If nor, then embargoed (delayed) research can be purchased through Refinitiv or FactSet.
Hi, Jason, thanks for these additional inputs!
BB
Correct. Solution: broker with a prime and set up your own executing broker relationships as needed to pay for the research (and the Bloomberg!) with soft dollars (commissions paid above and beyond what the exciting broker charges to perform the transaction). The broker banks your soft dollars and you tell them what legitimate research costs to pay out of it. BBG and these other platforms mentioned in this article qualify as ‘research’ under the Safe Harbor. You’ll need a hedge fund or mutual fund structure first of course with the min deposit with the prime to make it worthwhile for them to service you. Convo begins at $5m, depending on the prime. A top-tier prime min will be obv higher. There are some small shops (mini primes) that cater to start-up funds. Any case, that’s the way to go.
Good comparison. Any idea on Evaluatepharma, Globaldata and any other sector-based datasources? I guess these are sector-specific, but would be interesting to know their pricing.
Is there any comparison between Capital IQ, FactSet and EquityRT. I assume that all of them are good for equity research, but was wondering if all bases (Sell side, Buy side & asset management) are covered, which would be the most effective platform? I know all of them have a weblink to access data, which helps with mobility. I would appreciate it if someone has experience with all three of these, and can direct me to some comparisons?
Hey, I was deciding to get Factset but after trying out EquityRT I decided to give it a shot. Been using EquityRT for a while now. It’s a new platform on the market. Very easy to use and has an impressive Equities coverage. Also way way cheaper. Will 100% recommend if you’re looking for a value for money platform.
In 95% of the cases I am only looking for valuation comps of previous transactions, listed comparables, sector comps etc for my specific client. I don’t need share prices, analyst research, data feed, news, etc. What would you guys recommend of the above, and would maybe mergermarket or Zephyr from Moodys be better? Thanks
FactSet offers a nice package for Law Firms and the Legal Professionals.
recommendations for JSE equity market?
Depends on how deep you need to be
Bloomberg PricingThe cost of a Bloomberg Terminal is $24,000 per year, and terminals are leased on a two-year basis. The price drops to $20,000 per terminal per year for 2 or more terminals.
Academic discounts: For universities looking to power their finance labs with the famous terminals, Bloomberg offers significant incentives. For example, once schools commit to 3 terminals, they can get nine additional machines for free, dropping the total per-terminal cost to as little as $3,000 per year.
Is the $3000 per year still true, as of 2021?
Janson:
I don’t have current pricing but I would suspect it is generally close.
Best,
Jeff
Anyone know which might be best simply for market prices? I need futures, options on futures and fixed income prices (or yields, or both) for popular issues (mainly govt, some benchmark commercial).
S&P Cap IQ should be the cheapest of the 4 for that, but you should also check out some retail trading platforms. They may have good pricing. If you want real-time data you will still have to pay monthly fees with the exchanges or providers for this.
Hi, Jason, thanks for these additional inputs!
BB
Sounds like you’re keen on maybe doing some Treasury bond basis and/or relative value / yield curve trading there. CQG integrated client is typically the go-to platform for that. Cheers
I am wondering where you get this prices from… I just received a proposal from BBG and it does not match your numbers :-/
Maxim:
Feel free to let us know details and we can update the article!
Best,
Jeff
Hi Jeff,
Sure, here you go.
There are two options available: 1) Single Location (Multi-User/Shared Access)* One or more users can access the subscription on a single PC. Each PC requires its own subscription and remote access is not available; 2) Bloomberg Anywhere (Individual Access)* Only one user can access the subscription. That user can access it anywhere from any Internet-ready PC or mobile device.
The prices are the same for both options: 1 Subscription (U.S.$) $2305 per month; 2+ subscriptions (U.S.$) $2020 each per month.
Maxim:
Thanks!
Best,
Jeff
what would be a feature that should be in capital IQ pro which is lacking big time any guess?
CapIQ is not as good for real-time market data, but excellent for financial data.
Certainly these 4 are great global solutions. There are more that are geo-focus such as Teaser Platform which concentrates on MENA region specifically.
http://www.teaser.co
Hi, George,
Thanks for this additional information!
BB
Is WSP planning an update of this article? I would be very much interested.
Also our company uses the Infront Professional workstation (IPT). Would be interesting to have some feedback on their terminal as well.
Hi, Dirk,
I’m not sure if or when an update is planned. But we would welcome comments from you and others on that platform!
BB
S&P ig data is late and incomplete
Hi, Craig,
I expect there would be material changes on CapIQ since this article was released. If any stand out to you as especially important, please share them here!
BB
i rate eikon core highly.
sip cap iq pro is rubbish in conparison—for live up the minute info it is not designed…good for old stuff and historic things
Hi, Craig,
Thanks for offering your opinion here, it’s great to hear from users what they prefer, and others may benefit from it!
BB
No comparison for equity research to the Alpha Vee terminal? Same low cost of FactSet with far more functionality and you dont have to be a developer. Next review should put alphavee.com into the mix.
Hi, Judy,
Thanks for the suggestion and the hint to other readers of this article!
BB
It would be great to update a few of the items on the Refinitiv side with this article. Firstly, Refinitiv is now LSEG and the Eikon solution is now called Workspace.
Hi, Jason,
Thanks for this update!
BB